前幾天，總是怕大馬人民會因為沒笑話看而感到煩悶的馬華前老總翁詩傑又出手了。這一次他大談辭職，諷刺現任老總、他現在的頂頭上司蔡細歷，說他“不害怕辭職”的言論根本是自欺欺人，因為老蔡不只不是為了公民社會或是人民的福祉而辭職（老翁欲言又止，我幫他說清楚，老蔡是為了情色醜聞），更甚的是，辭職還辭不完全，保留了個國會議員的職位，好不要臉！
確實是好不要臉，辭職是因為醜事，還拿來講，對翁詩傑這個“道德至上”的仁人君子（當然只是對他人而言）來講，當然是十惡不赦的大罪，況且蔡細歷又是那個把他從權力最高峰上給拉下來，造就了老翁至今無人可撼動的“馬華任期最短總會長”頭銜的頭號仇人，有著這些緣由，就不難理解為何在這華人重大的農曆新年節日里，老翁依然肯在大年初一就動筆炮打蔡細歷了。
事實就是事實，不應該也決不能因為翁總的個人恩怨而抹殺掉。老蔡確實該罵，誰叫他有醜聞、誰叫他辭職辭得不乾不淨？罵是肯定要罵的，但我們做人要公平，罵人者若是犯下了相同或是更嚴重的錯誤，卻只會對著其他人指指點點，對自己的過錯卻遮著眼睛不看，這就是更不要臉，更應該罵了！蔡細歷做得不夠乾淨，但最後總還是辭職了嘛！但道德標準永遠只會用在他人身上、只會對他人說長弄短的老翁呢？
不必特別提醒，我國鼎鼎大名、響徹雲霄的大名--“不走翁”的來由相信大家都還是記憶猶新的。老翁在1128特大前，曾經夸下海口，就算是只輸一票也走，絕不戀棧權位。後來結果如何，大家心裡有數，小弟畫公仔不必畫出腸。總而言之，翁詩傑那不走翁的大名也就因為此事而聲名大噪，享“譽”全馬了！
看著這一個不遠之前的“歷史”事實，再看看老翁如今大言不慚的大談辭職。明白為什麼翁詩傑如今又有新的外號叫，人曰“翁不群”了吧？大馬政壇頭號偽君子，舍翁詩傑取誰？！
*ps:因為新年，實在沒法靜下心來寫文章，所以這篇文章遲了幾天才寫！雖然大家已經開工（小弟我還沒@.@"），還是要在這裡祝大家新年快樂，萬事如意！
55 评论 Comments:
他没食言，因为他不是输一票，他是输十四票 ：）
你看似蔡CD的枪手, 在玩无间道啊?
哈哈，又是你這個無名？說到你的主子肉痛啊？叫你老闆請有水準的一點來，不要為了省錢而弄巧成拙。
我和太平朋友談起不走翁時,他們說他XIA SUI(福建話)。
狗咬狗骨，确实帮我们解闷啊！对了，还有包括这里一只为了钱的无名狗！这么多狗，马来西亚人当然不闷啊！
2 thumps up for you, nice article! OTK eats shit!
馬華頭頭吵來吵去不就是為官位，為私利。什麼正義，誠信，道徳。。。笛笛打打的。。都是借口啦！如他／她們是正人君子，這些年來那麼多交通事故而不見那個交長負責下台，也不見有人自發自覺的為吧生港口的貪污案，衛生部的公家醫院的種種問題等等追究到底。如這些傢伙懂廉恥，他／她們早都該退位讓賢咯（或是馬華根本沒有當部長料的人才？）
自古以來奴才就是愛狗咬狗骨，這就是這些傢伙的專長！
Anonymous???? 为什么怕以真面目示人？？？
Ong TK is mouth shit, Chua Soi Lek is Sex shit, Ang Wei Siang is dog shit...........of course you can also say I am a xxx shit, so let's all together eat shit..... MCA will go to shit very soon, and every one is happy!!!!!
Loo兄說的對，雖然我不阻止大家以無名發言，但還是鼓勵最少弄一個名字（就算假名）也好，至少方便辨認。
Markko: Haha, only Shit will likes shit, will treat everybody else as shit and is very happy with that. If your brain is working well, i think you will definitely understand what is this means.
伟翔，越来越多狗或屎在你的博出现，就代表你的文章写得越来越好，越来越刺痛那些无耻政客的神经，继续加油！
多謝！我會加油的。
It is good to see MCA people fcuking each other. When God wants MCA to fall, He would make the grass roots go crazy first and eat shit.....my brain is working fine if you know what I mean and I am enjoying to see your way of shiok sendiri...please continue with it, by all means, yes, Anthony?
Oh Yes, Ang, BTW, your English is not up to standard,too many errors, please brush up. or you can continue to use mandarin, I can understand.
Markko,
Oh, you seem like very proud with you language, good. Ya, my English is poor and i never deny this. English is my third language, i choose to communicate with you in English, that's one way of brush up. So, what's wrong with that?
You said you brain is working well, but i don't think so. Am i a MCA member? I work for MCA? Don't show your stupid here. Use your brain, please.
And, you talk so many things, but where is the point?? Any wrong in my article? Did i say something is irrelevant or unreasonable in my article? If you can't understand Chinese, never mind, from the way you talk, I can understand.
Last words, please read my article more and try to understand it. I wrote more to criticize goverment and i'm not a member of any political parties. Ignorant is not wrong, but proud with ignorant is definitely wrong.
Maybe I can give you some links, I take responsible on what i wrote, with points inside. If any of my points wrong or you feel unreasonable, please state it out, don't talking crap only. These are my recent articles:
http://angwoeishang.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_10.html
http://angwoeishang.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_15.html
http://angwoeishang.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_18.html
http://angwoeishang.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_7234.html
http://angwoeishang.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_21.html
http://angwoeishang.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_29.html
I doubt you know the meaning of "responsible". Please talk or write with reasons. You can refer any person as shit or mca member or government supporter as you like, but please give reasons to support what you said. Otherwise, is just talking crap.
Everybody can easily do this (talking craps without any supporting reason), I can do whatever you did also, ie give you a title as shit or whatever else without reason, but i won't do that.
I said you don't understand my article, and i gave reasons. That's the different.
Friend, I'm still waiting for your reply, waiting for your reasons and points.
If you are right, then I can improve from that. You can also point out my grammactical error, I can also learn from that. Thanks.
a piece of shit
Haha ,You are both hot tempered and bulldozing, typical of a young chiku. There are 3 things to clarify :(1). I am neither pro-CSL nor pro-OTK, both are crooks anyway. And I have not disagreed with your comments about OTK whatsoever, however, to be a fine critic, you can't attack his bad side and simply deny his courage in poking the beehive of the PKFZ scandal. You spoke as if you are CSL's ma cai, which I believe you are not, but obviously that's the impression you have given to many readers, including anonymous. (2) you being a lawyer, you have no excuse for writing bad English, and I mean what i have said, brush up or brush out, full stop. (3)A lawyer is supposed to be sharp, analytical and stay cool , you have none of them : read my comments again, i have never said that you are MCA member,( tell me which part I referred you as MCA member?) And tell me which part i criticized your article? who is being stupid here?
If you are really concerned about the future of this country, write more about the misdeeds of the corrupted government, the racial divide and rule policies, the spiralling household debt that affects everybody...wow, the topic goes on and on. Pinpointing on OTK alone isn't going to get you any where. be more far sighted please.
i wish I can write more, but it seems impossible for me to do so here, maybe i can borrow this article from LM of merdekareview to sum up 80% of my opinions. (BTW, I sat for my MCE(SPM) Chinese paper 37 years ago and got distinction for it. But I have trouble with the Pin Yin when typing)
蛙鸣狗吠，妄作小人
【作者／LM】 Feb 08, 2011 11:44:09 am
我的意见是回应: 抨雪州以公帑支助苏海米 陈庆亮促以民联资源相助
人民之所以支持民联，那是因为对国阵贪污腐败的政权极度反感，如果不再改变，我们就没有未来。
如果不是308，申请了60年的公民权不可能几个月内就到手。纳吉也不会乱发贺年短讯给华人，巫统更不会低声下气讨好华印族。
只有那些被贱养在纱笼底下的狗狗才会看不清事实：巫统就是利用执政资源尽量打击民联，干掉一个就一个。
说到煽动，《前锋报》更是目无王法，但它却可逍遥法外，这是什么法律？
你蛙鸣狗吠，妄作小人。
note : courtesy thanks to LM and merdekareview
Brother,
It's disgusting to have nonsense people around but what to do, this is a open forum blog. Be cool, don't waste time argue about that. Chin up & Cheers!!
Thanks for you reply.
First, like you, I am neither pro-CSL nor pro-OTK too.
Second, you mentioned that I can't attack his bad side and simply deny his courage in poking the beehive of the PKFZ scandal. I'm really sorry but still have to say that you again made a terrible mistake. I didn't talk about his so called "courage" in PKFZ scandal? Please read my previous articles on this, please. Anyway, thank you for agreed with me that OTK do have bad side (at least to the point I mentioned in this article, about other points, such as PKFZ, please refer these two link http://angwoeishang.blogspot.com/2009/05/pkfz1207-308friend-46.html, http://angwoeishang.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_20.html ) You can find many article about OTK and CSL in my blog, please don't simply critic when you don't even understand it. If you want the article about CSL OR corrupted BN government, i can give you full list too.
Three, sure, i will brush up my English, and I did improve it, although i understand it's not enough. Thanks for you concern.
Four, yes, good English is important, but the inner moral is far more important for a lawyer or even for a normal human being. I can't imagine some people can gave others a title like shit or dog not even given any reasons. Please, where is your point in saying I'm a dog shit? Because I criticized OTK? Hei, you just mentioned in your last reply that you agree with me that OTK have some bad side, where is your explanation?
Five, thanks for your advise. Being sharp, analytic and stay cool, i will remember all these. But do you have all these? Sorry, i really don't see that, please answer my previous questions first. Stay cool~
Six, "If you are really concerned about the future of this country, write more about the misdeeds of the corrupted government, the racial divide and rule policies, the spiralling household debt that affects everybody...wow, the topic goes on and on. Pinpointing on OTK alone isn't going to get you any where. be more far sighted please."
Haha, I wrote about 600 article so far, please read for yourself, how many article did i write about the title you mentioned above. How about you? I feel like you more concern about OTK than the topics you mentioned above. Please read and understand before you comment. I can't remember how many times i mentioned this sentence. Besides, i'm quite interest on your blog also, can you open my sight with your blog? I'm really look forward to explore your blog.
Seven, i agree with LM too (but i can't see any relation with our topic here. Why on one hand critics the power-abuse government, we cant critics OTK on the other hand? If my criticize is wrong, please point it out). Actually i wrote on this before also, here is the link： http://angwoeishang.blogspot.com/2010/04/blog-post_4843.html。 There are more article on this, the corrupted and power-abuse government. Please find out and read yourself, don't be so lazy.
Eight, I don't like OTK, so do CSL or make it simple, the whole BN. But please go back to the beginning of our discussion, where is your point in your last few comments? I really didn't see it. Simply say is easy, everybody can do that, but it's useless. Please understand this.
___________________
Criticize OTK equal to CSL ma zai? I doubt your ability in reading chinese. In this article, i criticized CSL too. Do this mean i'm OTK ma zai too? Then you are who ma zai? Again, use your brain.
Thanks for your reply
Loo大哥，我published了長長的reply才看到你的回复。多謝，我相信理性的討論可以探討事實，所以我不會逃避。（打了那么长英文，现在用回中文）
問題很簡單，不支持馬華就不可以批評翁詩傑？支持民聯就不可以批評翁詩傑？批評翁詩傑就是支持蔡細歷？世界有那麼單純就好咯！
重點是：我寫的文章有沒有錯（不管內容主角是蔡細歷、翁詩傑、國陣還是民聯）？如果我文章是對的話，為什麼不能寫？
關於蔡細歷的一些文章（看來我又突然變成是支持翁詩傑的了@.@"）:
http://angwoeishang.blogspot.com/2010/09/blog-post_16.html
http://angwoeishang.blogspot.com/2010/05/blog-post.html
http://angwoeishang.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_23.html
After i published the comment, i notice some grammar errors too. But too bad, can't edit comment after you published it. Maybe next time i should check before publish.
But anyway, I never deny and admit that my English is really bad, please correct me if anything wrong with my language, thank you in advance.
First, I feel nothing wrong with this article. The main point I get is that joker acting 五十步笑百步.
Second, we r not talking the bravery here, but the resigning. Thats why not considering the PKFZ.
Thirdly, who care using bad english in a blog's comment, as long as is understandable.
Although this article so straight forward, still got people dont know how to read and understand whats the author try to express, 真无奈
True. Who really cares about the standard of the English language used in a Chinese-written blog? The answer is: those who can't rebut the content. Mere excuse. By the way, Wei Siang's English is not that bad.
Momo: I did write an article carrying a title "翁詩傑五十步笑一百步" before (i changed the title to "翁詩傑賊喊抓賊" later on but the content remains), here is the link of the article: http://angwoeishang.blogspot.com/2010/12/blog-post_15.html. However I doubt that our friend can understand the meaning of "五十步笑一百步" and "賊喊抓賊". Btw, they carry almost the same meaning.
Kenny: Thanks. I will work harder on it.
wow, you have many supporters, alas, mostly shoe polishers, continue to label unsupporting critics as nonsense,dogs,guns for hire ,cypetroopers...will drive traffic away from this blog, that is good for you. Some have discouraged you from improving your english, yes , stay forever in the snail shell and emulate that loyarrazak fella in the TBH case and make international jokes with his broken english. If you are not a lawyer, who really cares? let those who are complacent with ther broken english rot in hell.With friends like this, who needs enemy?
The article by LM has nothing to do with your OTK article, it's my way of saying, look. MCA is a dead meat, let's focus on more important issues such as that mentioned in LM's article.Those who still argued about me criticizing your OTK article are merely stupid with cow brains. Requesting you to write more on important issues means you have not written enough ,NOT that you have not written any.sigh....generation gap!
Frankly, I have busy business schedule that does not permit me to write blog, but I do take the time off to read about 20 other blogs, half of them in Chinese. I chanced upon your article on Msiakini and ended in your blog by accident. Most of the blogs I read practise freedom of speech, whether supporting or unsupporting, tom dick or harry, opposition or cypertroopers.
haha got to go, lunch is ready....BTW, stay cool and best of luck in your lawyer profession. my business deals with too many lawyers, I might bump into you one day, but until then.....sayonara!!Don't bother to reply as I will get lost by myself before your shoe polishers start amok again.
"continue to label unsupporting critics as nonsense,dogs,guns for hire ,cypetroopers" (should be cyber troopers, isn't?)
Surprise! Are you talking about yourself? Look at your first comment, to date, you haven't give any reasons for your insulting comment. Instead, now you said that my article is all right. Then how you justify yourself in label me as dogshit?
Disagree with you means "shoe polisher"? You can't even reply with supporting details to what you have said, how can people agree or support with what you have said or done? Don't be so self opinionated please. Even if they are shoes polisher (some of them i don't even know them), why they polished my shoes instead of yours?
Btw, no need keep mentioning how you success in your career or education or whatsoever else, all these doesn't support or make what you have said right or changing it from wrong to right. I respect people older than me, but this doesn't count, especially in a discussion like we are having now. You are older or successful or whatsoever else doesn't mean you are right, understand? Hence, use your reasons and points to convince people, not your identity.
Please take 5 seconds (of course, i know you are busy, so do I.) to think about this: why there are so many people disagree with you?
You can turning around with what you wrote, and you can say whatever you want without even bother to explain it, or keep changing on what you have written. It's definitely okay, this is your right, and I respect it. But respect doesn't mean agree.
So now you are changing from critic my article to ask me to write more in other topic. Okay, i accept this, but, you haven't answer this question: Why can't i critic OTK if he deserves the criticism? Do you have right or authority to limit what topic i can write and topic that i can't?
Sorry, you don't. If my article is wrong, please point it out, i will improve and appreciate it. On what thing should i comment, it's my choice and my right. You are assaulting my right. Freedom of speech including the right to choose what I what to speak, understand?
Anyway, I enjoy the discussion with you, at least you are much better than those who talking crap and never return and bother to explain their nonsense. Thank you.
Ang,if you write blog and open to comment,then you should have a heart strong enough to accept dissenting views and stand up to critism.From your argument with MARKKO, you display your immaturity. I hope you will one day mellow with age and talk cogently. I like youth with an enquiring mind like you,and hope there are more in our country. Btw, like most of the English educated LKK, I have difficulty in pin yin and am too old to learn.
Grandma,
Thanks for you advice. Thank you.
Hei, Markko, your English is really superb, can't even differentiate "not that bad" and "good". Even it's good, it doesn't mean no need to improve at all. 不进则退, have you ever heard about this Chinese idiom?
Some advises for you: Cool down, don't be so extreme and try to listen what others say.
Ang: Want to know the reason for calling you a dog shit? (it has nothing to do with your comments on OTK): ( to be fair, I won't challenge you from calling me xxx shit, if that makes you happy, freedom of speech ma!)
(from past comments in your article):
anonymous said:你看似蔡CD的枪手, 在玩无间道啊?
Ang WS:哈哈，又是你這個無名？說到你的主子肉痛啊？叫你老闆請有水準的一點來，不要為了省錢而弄巧成拙。
That's unbecoming of a young professional to treat a visitor like this…… whoever he is!........dog shit!
YK Loo :Anonymous???? 为什么怕以真面目示人？？？
A stupid fool to ask a question like this...........who the hell is he?
(hi, anonymous, i thought you are the other anonymous, but obviously not!)
Kenny Liew: not that bad means rather bad, not so good, bad but not as bad as momo or slightly worse than kenny liew but definitely not acceptable for a lawyer who is required to draft legal documents, interpret the law and argue in the courtroom for the truth, nothing but the truth. Like I said, who cares about momo or kenny liew if your english is not up to standard, but it's definitely a no no for a lawyer.
you are damn right about 不进则退,( you are teaching a LKK how to eat rice?) , at 54, I am in my 2nd year of DBA courses trying to improve my knowledge and English as well. So what are you doing to ensure 不进则退 for yourself? Or are you just plainly satisfied with asking OTK to eat shit? What about Ibrahim Ali? What about PKFZ? ( i hope this time Ang WS won't try to twist my words to mean that i try to show off with my qualification, the last time i told him i have a busy business schedule, he said I was showing off my success, ....my Goodness....)
( and kenny liew,please don't try to put your words im my mouth, I have never said that my english is superb, but it's good enough to tell you that your "advises" should spell advice (no s).)Did you say extreme? you must be kidding me..... I am telling all and sundry to focus on more important national issues, rather than picking on OTK who is already a dead ant who has no more value, not even worth one cent....If Ang and his group of supporters (including Kenny liew)are still living in the snail shell, talking about petty issues, shiok sendiri and missing the bigger picture, this nation has no hope.
take a look at this blog 文情并茂 (i am sure you all know his link) and see the difference. Originality, 一针见血， never炒人家的冷飯。I have followed his blog for some time and never have the opportunity to challenge him, because he is too good!!!!
come on, wake up, Ang, nobody says you cannot criticize OTK, but why waste your time? It has been written by so many others, he is just irrelevant anymore. MCA is dead meat, only 25% of the chinese population remains as its hardcore fans,brainless, @#$%^, *&$#@( the remaining words are purposely deleted for fear of being labelled extreme!)What have they done for us for the past 52 years.(read LM's article and many more in malaysiakini and merdekareview）
honestly, given my busy schedule ( show off again ?) I shouldn't waste my time talking Jesus here, I have found new love in malaysia chronical and desiderata-ylchong, his english is so powerful, beautiful and wonderful, really amaze me! (no comment on his article….yet)The other anonymous, care to join me? Or you are already there? Silly me!
My final farewell to everybody in this blog, take care..
(apology for any typo error…………cybertroopers ? thank you)
My last word for you: look at yourself first, why you said can exactly apply on your goodself. See you.
(What i want to say is already in my previous reply. Can't comment on OTK, who are you? do you know who is 許國偉? Look at his new article in Malaysiakini).
唉，有史以來聽過最荒謬的謬論。因為其下野，因為其沒有價值，就算他做了多麼可惡、多麼令人討厭的事實、講了多麼令人不爽的鳥話，你也不能批評！好好好，馬華不能批評，翁詩傑不能批評，不管他們做了什麼事情！好個言論自由啊～還有還有，污衊他人沒問題，對污衊的人有要求是dog shit，這樣的人還敢批評人沒有禮貌，原來罵人dog shit且不給理由或似是而非的理由就是有禮貌的，又是一個好野的謬論，天下無敵啊！對不起，我不會給你任何侮辱性的名號的，因為我知道討論是理性的交鋒，是道理跟道理的碰撞，並不是抹黑或身份的交鋒，這我之前也說過了。
原來只有批評當權者有權力者才不是浪費時間。批評一些應該批評、有錯的人（承認的了），就是浪費時間、dog shit。呵呵，那我經常寫電影、遊記、情感、歷史等文章，更是浪費了許多時間啊～不浪費時間，就是寫給你一個人喜歡看的，又是一個超級荒謬的標準。
至於那位無名，回去看看吧（不要又顯現出自己的無知），每一篇批評翁詩傑的文章，都會出現一個無名，丟下一句污衊人的話就走。回复了幾次，質問了幾次，卻永遠都得不到答案（所以才會有“又是你這個無名”的話）。這是原因。當然，欲加之罪何患無辭？為了合理化自己沒有禮貌的用詞（你說你那麼老，呵呵，還真難想像），只好說另一些不合理的話來掩蓋（挑戰他人=dog shit，什麼邏輯？笑死人～），挖洞補洞，只有越來越多的洞。
其他？看回我過去的留言吧，這是對此事的最後一個回复了。雞同鴨講、對牛彈琴，不必再浪費時間了。
忘了說，凌國文可以算是在下的好朋友之一，確實有很多需要跟他學習的地方。有勞你提醒。
許國偉? my home town mate and my junior in secondary school. OTK is his NO. 1 enemy. He is a specialist in OTK.
Ang:"....Can't comment on OTK, who are you?......."
markko :".....nobody says you cannot criticize OTK,...."
Can't understand English? go ahead with what you want to do, I have nothing more to say...
Don't accept my reason ? fine, why pressed for the answer in the first place?.....sigh!
咦？斷章取義的意思知道嗎？對不起，要睡了，直接用中文回，晚安～（是的，我不會英文，您的英文是天下第一的！小弟自愧不如。失敬。）
轉述南方朔的文章，用在你身上還蠻適合的（許國偉在他的文章有轉述，這篇文章蠻紅的，這已經是第三次看到了）：
述当代知名的领导学专家波耶特（Joseph H. Boyett）在近著《选民进化论》（Won’t Get Fooled Again）裡，谈自恋型领袖：
──他喜欢刻意表演自己的一些专长，如秀自己的英文，他总觉得自己永远对，都是别人误会他、嫉妒他、中伤他；
──他看不起别人，总认为别人没什麼，他贡献最大；他的语言裡，最常出现的是“我”这个字；
──他没有同理心也不想有同理心；他不需要了解别人，只要别人了解他；
──当别人谈到他的问题时，他通常都会做别的事，用行为语言表示不耐烦；
──他喜欢用道德语汇自我包装，显示完美；他对年龄与身体有病态的敏感；
──他不信任别人，只相信小圈子亲信；他拒绝别人分享成功，也拒绝承担过失；
──他的决策草率但都有理由；他从不肯定下属，只要下属效忠。
(看回你的留言，就知道你直接有沒有講過不應該談OTK了，你說沒有就沒有，你的反复我已經我習慣了～真要睡了，晚安！)
another piece of shit! Arrogant young man but empty vessel makes the most noise.
All the talents have gone leaving hallf past lawyers in malaysia. Another razak abdullah in the making.
pro-OTK
哈哈，越來越多人講話不用給理由的，“好事好事”。
Wow, finally some dogs admit that they are dogs for OTK, good! Dog is dog, no need explanation on it.
被人開了頭，越來越多無理攻擊者。理性討論，用理由來說服人這麼淺顯的例子都不知道。開始停止回复，要人身攻擊的，歡迎繼續。
（Markko在檳城上網，那兩位互相人身攻擊的無名一位在彭亨另一位在雪蘭莪。甚至連ip也可以知道。以為可以躲在sarong後面的人，以為沒有人知道，那就繼續用無理來攻擊吧，這樣只會讓自己更醜陋。）
伟翔，不要被他们影响也不必灰心。这叫欲加之罪，何患无辞。你今天评论这个，他们就问你怎么不评论那个，明天你评论那个，他们又问你怎么不评论另一个。重点是他们就不敢针对你的评论来争论，也不敢针对你所写的来评论，只敢顾左右而言他！就算你明明已经写过了，他们还是会问一样的问题，因为他们根本就姿势来捣乱的。加油。不必受这些人的影响。
"前幾天，總是怕大馬人民會因為沒笑話看而感到煩悶的馬華前老總翁詩傑又出手了。這一次他大談辭職，諷刺現任老總、他現在的頂頭上司蔡細歷"(1)，說他“不害怕辭職”的言論根本是自欺欺人，因為老蔡不只不是為了公民社會或是人民的福祉而辭職(2)
1. 我先过目了你BLOG POST, 2010DECEMBER 你开始批翁诗杰. 我量你没甚麽卵爬,你敢批你主子吗? 你主子上了位沒做为，TENANG 输了华裔票.
大馬人民 煩+悶
煩-分猪肉越来越凶, 总制品都拿来开刀, 百姓的血被抽的很凶,菜CD不敢呛声
悶-马华出奇的悶, 小商们经营堪苦.福祉,老总挣个屁,连特大迟迟不开!
暴雨欲来的沉寂,老翁独个吹号角,意无反顾,干!
2.胡说八道!辭職是为了降温!连国席都辭才叫认真!
三人小组事件,逼害,我们同情.它有才干我们珍惜.翁给他权力他造反,留着把柄的人不能当主帅的,有人不信邪有人念权,好让时间证明.至今,他给华社什麽?
不走翁,不倒翁,打从你还是一条精虫时就拼政治,我那时就认识他,20多年打死不走,经得起时间考验.
你这个货色让我想起胡建彪......
老菜敢将翁Pandan国席撤除,翁敢辭職.大不了另起炉灶.翁的支持不是靠换票花钱,是靠时间经营,杆大旗来的.我们是支持翁诗杰,不看马华!
你要把这讯息清楚的转达你的主子
还有,再过20年我都会记得你这个奴才!
伟翔一篇博文，激出了那么多马华败类，好啊！一篇一篇看？电脑不会用哦？直接在search里面打你老板的名字翁诗杰这三个字就可以找到了。第一篇骂翁诗杰的文章，是2008年，以后要说谎做多一点功课。翁诗杰这个伪君子，你那么仰慕他为什么不反驳这篇文章啊？来来来，反驳，我也想看看，看你说的出什么好理由。马华这种败类党，出的就全是败类，连文章都看不懂就急着批评，上面不是有人说了这是一篇50步笑100步的文章，看不懂也问问人。连菜CD也骂你看出？真是白痴马华党员！
奴才就以为他人也是奴才，一句话说完。
伟翔是在自己的博客写文章,他不是专栏作家,所以他有权力写他想写的任何题材没有人有权力阻止或干预他的自由和权力.
在 "当今大马" 投稿不是想像中那么容易, 我写的文章常常就被投篮. 所以编辑先生是经过严格的遴选过滤才会刊登的.
伟翔的文章写得很好, 而且几乎每一篇都排在最受欢迎的第一名, 这已经是对他写作的肯定和证明. 不是 xia shui 了当今大马, 是有人戴了有色眼镜且用歪了的角度去看待他的作品, 所以觉得他的作品不正了,真的很可惜!
还有,伟翔是用中文书写他的文章, 就因为他尊重用英语留言的网友用英语回应而被批评他的语言能力, 那是很不公平的. 英语程度低落是目前大马学生所面对的问题,那是因为愚蠢自私的执政者鼠目寸光没有远见所造成的恶果, 你们该向当权者,始作俑者开炮, 不是向受害者极尽奚落, 那不算英雄也无法改变年轻一代的英语能力. 年长一代因为当年大马中学是以英语为教学媒介语而接受英语教育,英语好过年轻一代那是很自然的事情,不要因此感到骄傲.而我们一代的国语能力差过伟翔一代的也是事实, 但也不应该感到羞耻.但是我们不应该用这样的事情来做比较, 因为这是很不公平的, 也根本无法比较的.
伟翔的英语不错, 比起那些拿了政府奖学金来澳洲念硕士的学生要好很多很多, 我先生在改他们的考卷时,时常面对看不明白他们的英语的问题而懊恼, 那是马来西亚国的耻辱. (我最讨厌比烂, 那很没出息!).不过我相信, 以伟翔的聪明才智, 等到他 50 多岁的时候, 他的英语肯定会跟他中文造诣一样或有过之而无不及.
身为政治人物要有心理准备接受挑战和面对众人的评论, 因为你们领的是纳税人的血汗钱. 现在的年轻人学识渊博见识广阔,对于世界的时事, 政治的认知已经远远的超出了想像,所以对于政治人物的要求也提高了.大马的政客们如果还是沉迷于权势名利, 没有实际的作为,说话不算数或不经大脑, 很快的就会被选民唾弃了, 好自为之吧!
伟翔, 你年纪小小 ( 没比我上大学的儿子大多少)但却很关心国家大事, 这是很难得的. 你的文章言之有物, 一针见血, 所以才会有人跳上跳下, 但又理屈词穷,所以用了烂招, 蔡智勇说的 “奥步” 来中伤你, 诋毁你………. 不要因为这样影响了你的情绪, 继续前进, 期待你更多的好文章,加油加油!!
好！！！！
楼上的芊芊：
如果这里是facebook，我一定大大力赞你的留言。写得太好了，真是把那些不敢面对事实，不敢面对面交锋，只敢玩语言和文字游戏的缩头乌龟的真面目完全一针见血地写出来。本来还想reply那些缩头乌龟的，看了你的reply，完全就不需要了，完全写出我要说的，让我自己来讲都讲不到那么好。太赞了！
Kenny Liew:
你好!
谢谢你的鼓励.我以前是运动员,所以很注重公平竞争.技不如人就输得心服口服,自己再接再厉迎头赶上.赢就要赢得真材实料,靠耍阴招胜利的,胜之不武,受之有愧,这样的人让人 "笔"视"尺"笑.....遗憾的是,大马政坛就有很多这样的人. :(
我没有开面子书帐号,因为我不鼓励孩子使用 facebook,一直到她们念完大学为止, 所以我自己也得以身作则,因为身教比言教有效.
谢谢你 Kenny, 祝福你和家人有个愉快的情人节!
这里也顺便祝福小兄弟和雯情人节快乐! :)
翁诗杰除了xiasui还是xiasui..铁一般的事实。
他自己還以為很厲害～
Post a Comment